It is scarcely progress when one mode of Uberinterpretation is laid to rest, only to have others take its place.
Richard J. Dillon, “Previewing Luke’s Project from his Prologue (Luke 1:1-4),” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 43.2 (April 1981): 207, fn 5.
I might add that Dillon’s proposal for Luke’s composition from his thesis was a bit “Uber” to me: Dillon, From Eye-Witnesses to Ministers of the Word: Tradition and Composition in Luke 24 (AnBib 82; Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1978).